Landing Page Design skill for Codex

Every section answers the visitor's next question. Codex plans a landing page from its single conversion goal and the visitor's awareness stage, then picks a section order where each block answers one question. It designs the hero for a 390 px fold, keeps one consistent CTA, puts real proof next to the claim it supports, trims forms, and checks LCP, CLS and analytics events before calling it done.

  • Design & UX
  • $landing-page-design
  • 162 lines
  • 2 files
  • ~1,950 tokens
  • MIT
  • Updated

Install

curl -fsSL codexskills.dev/install.sh \  | sh -s -- landing-page-design

Installs to ~/.agents/skills/landing-page-design/ for every project on this machine.

104-line POSIX script. No sudo, no telemetry. Read install.sh

Use it in Codex

Start a prompt with $landing-page-design, or pick it from /skills. You can also just describe the task: Codex reads the description below and loads the playbook when your request matches.

What Codex reads before loading it

Designs landing page structure for conversion - one goal per page, section order matched to visitor awareness, hero anatomy, CTA placement and styling, proof placed next to the claim it supports, pricing and FAQ objection handling, short forms, LCP-safe hero media, and analytics events, delivered as a section outline and built page. Use when planning or rebuilding a landing page, product or feature page, waitlist or signup page, when a page gets traffic but few conversions, or when asked what sections a marketing page needs.

Use it when

  • Planning or rebuilding a product, feature, waitlist or campaign page
  • A page gets visits but low signups or demo requests
  • Deciding which sections, proof and CTAs a marketing page needs
  • Matching a landing page to an ad or email campaign

Use something else when

How to check the result

A 390 x 844 screenshot shows headline, subhead and primary CTA above the fold, every CTA fires its analytics event once, and mobile LCP is 2.5 s or less.

The mistake it prevents

Giving one page several competing goals and CTA labels, so no single next step stands out.

~/.agents/skills/landing-page-design/SKILL.md

--- name: landing-page-design description: Designs landing page structure for conversion - one goal per page, section order matched to visitor awareness, hero anatomy, CTA placement and… license: MIT ---

A landing page works when a first-time visitor understands what it is, who it is for and what to do next within five seconds on a phone, every section answers the next question that visitor would ask, and the one primary action is visible at every decision point. Beauty is necessary but secondary; a gorgeous page with three competing goals converts worse than a plain one with one.

Inputs before designing

Write these down; ask only for what cannot be inferred from the repo or product:

  • Goal: the single conversion (start trial, book demo, join waitlist, buy). Secondary actions (docs, contact) are allowed only as quieter links.
  • Audience and traffic source: ad click, search, launch post, email, partner. Message match matters: the hero must echo what brought them here.
  • Awareness stage: do they know the problem, the category, the product?
  • Proof available: customer logos with permission, quotes with names, metrics, ratings, case studies, security certifications. Never invent any of these.
  • Constraints: brand system, framework, CMS, analytics tool (check AGENTS.md).

Section order by awareness

Visitor knowsLead withTypical order
Nothing (cold ads, social)The problem in their wordsProblem hero, cost of the problem, how it works, proof, offer, FAQ, CTA
The problem, not solutionsThe outcomeOutcome hero, how it works (3 steps), product in action, proof, objections, CTA
The category, comparingDifferentiationPositioning hero, comparison, feature depth, proof, pricing, FAQ, CTA
Your product (retargeting, email)The offerOffer hero with CTA, what’s new, proof, pricing, CTA

Each section must answer one question: “What is it?”, “Will it work for me?”, “How does it work?”, “Who else uses it?”, “What does it cost?”, “What if…?”. If a section answers no question, cut it.

Hero anatomy

[Logo]                                         [Nav: 3-4 links]  [Primary CTA]
Eyebrow (optional): category or audience, 2-5 words
Headline: outcome or differentiator, 4-10 words, the page's only h1
Subhead: how it delivers that, for whom, 15-30 words
[Primary CTA: verb + object]  [Secondary: quieter link, e.g. "See how it works"]
Risk reducer: "Free for 14 days. No card required."
Proof strip: one concrete metric, rating, or recognizable customers
Visual: the product doing the thing (real UI, cropped to the moment of value)

Rules:

  • On a 390 x 844 viewport, headline, subhead and primary CTA are visible without scrolling. Check with a screenshot, not imagination.
  • The visual shows the product, not an abstract illustration, unless the product is invisible (infrastructure); then show the result or a diagram of the effect.
  • One h1. Headline sizes: 36–48 px on mobile, 56–80 px desktop for short headlines.
  • Navigation is minimal on paid-traffic pages; every extra link is an exit.

CTA design

  • Label = verb + what they get: “Start free trial”, “Get the report”, “Book a 20-min demo”. Avoid “Submit”, “Learn more” as a primary.
  • Same label and destination every time it appears; repeat after proof, after pricing and at the end. On long pages, a sticky header CTA after the hero scrolls away.
  • Primary CTA is the most saturated element in its viewport; no other element uses the accent at the same weight.
  • Minimum 44 px tall, full width on mobile when it is the main action of the section.
  • Put the risk reducer (free tier, cancel anytime, time required) directly under it.

Proof placement

Proof typePlace it
LogosUnder the hero, only if recognizable to this audience; 5–8 max
Quote with name, role, photoNext to the feature claim it supports
Metric (“cut close time from 9 to 3 days”)In the hero proof strip or the outcome section
Case studyAfter “how it works”, with one number in the card
Ratings (G2, App Store)Near the CTA and pricing
Security / compliance badgesNear forms and pricing for B2B

Specific beats generic: “Saved our finance team 11 hours a week” with a name and company beats “Amazing product!”.

Pricing and objections

  • Show price on the page when it is public; hiding it raises doubt. Highlight one plan as recommended; annual/monthly toggle shows the saving.
  • FAQ answers real objections (data security, migration, contract length, what happens after the trial), five to eight items, using <details> for native accessibility.
  • Comparison tables: your column first or highlighted, rows phrased as outcomes.

Forms

  • Ask for the minimum: email for a waitlist or trial; add fields only if sales qualification truly requires them. Each extra field costs completions.
  • Inline validation on blur, clear error text, labels always visible (see form-ux).
  • After submit: a confirmation state on the page that says what happens next.

Build notes

  • Hero image: fetchpriority="high", explicit width/height, AVIF/WebP, no lazy loading. Target LCP ≤ 2.5 s and CLS ≤ 0.1 at p75 on mobile.
  • Avoid carousels and autoplay video in the hero; if video is essential, use a poster image and play on click.
  • Fire analytics events: cta_click (with location: hero, pricing, footer), form_start, form_submit, pricing_toggle. Check the project’s analytics wrapper and naming convention first.
  • Respect cookie consent: no tracking before consent where required.

Workflow

- [ ] 1. Write goal, audience, awareness stage, proof inventory
- [ ] 2. Choose section order from the awareness table; write the outline
- [ ] 3. Wireframe the hero at 390 px and 1440 px
- [ ] 4. Draft section content (real copy or clearly marked drafts)
- [ ] 5. Build sections; apply the visual direction (frontend-design)
- [ ] 6. Add analytics events and form handling
- [ ] 7. Verify: 5-second test, fold screenshots, Lighthouse, events

Verification

  • Five-second test: show the 390 px hero screenshot to yourself cold; can you state what it is, who it is for and the next step? If not, rewrite headline or subhead.
  • Fold check: npx playwright screenshot --viewport-size "390,844" <url> .shots/fold.png; primary CTA visible.
  • Squint test: the CTA is one of the two heaviest elements in the hero.
  • Lighthouse mobile: LCP, CLS and accessibility pass budgets: npx lighthouse <url> --only-categories=performance,accessibility --output=html --output-path=.shots/lighthouse.html (mobile emulation is the default). It needs a local Chrome, and npx may need network approval to fetch the package.
  • Events: click every CTA with the analytics debugger or network panel open; each fires once with the right location.

Gotchas

  • Clever headlines that need the subhead to make sense. Clarity first, wit second.
  • Feature lists without outcomes; each feature line should say what the user gets.
  • Six equal CTAs across the page with different labels and destinations.
  • Testimonials grouped in a carousel nobody advances; place quotes beside claims.
  • Logo walls of companies whose permission you do not have. Ask the user.
  • Sending users from a focused landing page to a generic homepage on CTA click.

Output contract

**Goal:** <conversion>  **Audience/source:** <who, from where>  **Awareness:** <stage>
**Outline:**
1. Hero: <headline draft> / CTA "<label>" / proof: <item>
2. <Section>: answers "<question>"
...
**CTA placements:** hero, after proof, pricing, footer (same label)
**Proof used:** <list with source/permission status>
**Events:** cta_click{location}, form_start, form_submit
**Checks:** 390 px fold ok, LCP <x> s, CLS <y>, a11y score <z>
**Draft copy to replace:** <sections>

What the zip contains

SKILL.md plus the interface file below. Nothing runs on install.

agents/openai.yamlgenerated from this page

Gives the Codex app a display name, a one-line description and a starter prompt for this skill.

interface:
  display_name: "Landing Page Design"
  short_description: "Every section answers the visitor's next question"
  default_prompt: "$landing-page-design Plan the sections for a landing page for our new expense-tracking feature"

About this skill

Written and maintained by the Codex Skills editors to the same editorial standard as every skill here: a selective description, a real workflow, known pitfalls and a way to verify the work. First published , last updated . MIT licensed. Something wrong or out of date? Tell us.

esc